Skip to main content

"Fixing" teams

In the past couple of weeks, a huge controversy has broken out in the Indian Premier League (IPL), a popular cricket tournament organized by the Board for Control of Cricket in India (BCCI). 3 players of the Rajasthan Royals, one of the 9 teams in the competition were arrested by the Delhi police for their alleged involvement with bookies and underperforming in their roles for the team during various cricket matches. Although the element of fixing is not new to cricket, having famously been admitted to by Hansie Cronje, the South African cricket team captain in the year 2000, the recent arrests and ongoing investigations by the police has lead to wide spread outrage amongst cricket followers and fans in India and elsewhere. The evidence against the three players was telephone conversations and the footage from the games in which they underperformed.

While the fallout of the investigations continue, the captain of the affected team, Rahul Dravid, called the effect of having the players being called out in this fashion, like a bereavement. That would be putting it mildly. Putting oneself in the shoes of a captain of a sports team, especially in a game like cricket where decisions such as field placings, personnel to deploy at specific positions in the arena, batting and bowling positions are taken on the field by the captain in charge, it must be shattering to learn of the breach of trust from the team members. The playing captain has myriad added responsibilities apart from their own primary skills as part of the XI that form the team. These include, but are not limited to, facing the media, representing the team in various functions, motivating the team, planning the action on the field in advance, deciding on the playing XI, etc. A fundamental premise that every leader has is that every personnel is trustworthy. When given a task to perform, the team mate will put in his/ her best effort for the benefit of the team. In the case of the Rajasthan Royals and their captain, this trust was broken by the three players.

The dynamic nature of human personalities ensures that every team has its share of characters. Each person is different, what motivates different individuals is different. As the leader of a team, it is important to understand every playing and non-playing member. If that is not possible, then the team needs to be broken up into smaller groups of players, each with a designated and trustworthy leader, building a hierarchy of trusting relationships. These relationships maintain a synergy within the team and when they are in resonance, they serve as fantastic omens that the leader can recognize and take appropriate action on. Now building this kind of a structure takes time and effort and most importantly, dedication and careful thought. But once built, the team performs efficiently and remarkably well. One team that I see this kind of synergy in, is with the Miami Heat. The fun that the players seem to have when on court is infectious and evident to even those watching on television. The results of the team are in sync with the perception that I have of the team as well. Of course, in sport, the team is all that is visible of the organization but the make-up of the entire franchise itself can not be undermined either.

Fixing a team for consistent excellence begins from the top. When relationships are nurtured and embellished with caring within an organization, it feeds excellence in execution. The vision to achieve sustained relationships in a team will enable success to be achieved and the "fixers" within the team to fall by the wayside. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Leadership - Trump style

One of the latest tirades from Donald Trump was against Lebron James.  I have been thinking of his style of functioning and that of the "traditional" style of leadership. All the books that I have read on leaders, all the leaders that I have seen, are more or less, role models. At the very least, they offer words of wisdom and speak what I like to call, "The Universal Truth". Take Barack Obama - I am no expert on his policies or the impact that he had on the economy of the United States or that of the world. I was always impressed with the way he carried himself and the way that he spoke. His handling of particularly volatile situations seemed to always be in a calm and measured method. Mr. Trump, on the other hand, comes across as very petty, impetuous and pusillanimous. Trump is the President of the United States of America. Arguably, one of the most prominent jobs in the world and definitely a job that is not easy. There, we have a person who is cheap enough ...

The Great Debaters

I watched the movie - The Great Debaters (released in 2007), directed by and starring Denzel Washington. In my opinion, he is one of the best actors in the world at the moment. The movie is inspired by  a true story that took place in the year 1935 when a small school in Marshall, Texas broke new ground in debating against the top white colleges of the time and won. Like most Denzel Washington movies, the movie was excellent. The actors and the depiction of the time - 1935, is supreme. In the movie, the character Melvin Tolson  narrates a story about the origin of the word "lynching". He says, " Anybody know who Willie Lynch was? Anybody? Raise your hand. No one? He was a vicious slave owner in the West Indies. The slave-masters in the colony of Virginia were having trouble controlling their slaves, so they sent for Mr. Lynch to teach them his methods. The word "lynching" came from his last name. His methods were very simple, but they were diabolical.  Keep ...

Honor "No"

As a child, the Amar Chitra Katha was a major source of Hindu mythological stories. The stories often dealt with the kings and queens of the years gone by, part mythological and part historical. Now, the kings, being kings, would order things done and voila! there it would be. One such story narrated the happenings - the king would only have to shout, "Who is there?!" and there would be a few courtiers, soldiers that would come running to receive his orders. Nowadays, if I were to shout "Who is there?!" at home, I would hear back: "What is wrong with you? Who else will be here?" Indication enough that I am best off doing what ever task there was to be done, by myself. Move to the office, shouting "Who is there?!" whenever a task needs to be done urgently will return inquisitive looks from all within ear shot. Of course, the source of enormous levity at dinner table conversations at all the employees' homes would be an appreciable side ef...